Human Sciences (Economics/Politics) and Ethics
We know from past experience that many of you like to do your TOK presentations on conspiriacy theories. But ask yourself this:
Question: When is a conspiracy not a conspiracy?
Answer: When the motive for an action is out in the open.
When things are kept secret and close to the chest of only a few people, we commonly assume that something devious is happening behind the scenes. Think of all the usual conspiracy theories.
When the politicians who are in power and who lead governments justify the use fiction and deceit to keep order and peace and safety in the world, are they not also simply working to hold onto their power?
So how can we know that this is what they are really doing? That the interests of the general public is NOT at the heart of their motives, but only their own personal interests? We know either because they're doing it openly or because someone digs into their affairs and exposes them (cf. the recent expenses scandal in British politics).
Now look at this clip and decide for yourself if the actions that brought about the war in Afghanistan could be regarded as being part of a conspiracy theory. In other words, are the motives for fighting there hidden or open? And does it make any difference?
The clip lasts for just under 15 minutes, so be patient and try to follow the argument and to think about the TOK aspects of the talk...
Michael Ruppert analyses the present geopolitical crisis
[ Source: http://www.jovanovic.com/blog.htm - November, 2009 ]